Saving the World; One Person At A Time[sm] _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Make Every Day Christmas; Every Night Christmas Eve!
Is there A GANG OF FIVE OLIGARCHS in this group? ANTWON HANDS OFF MY LEG.
AMERICA'S OLIGARCHY
THE FIVE ARISTOCRATS
THAT WAS SOME VOTE. WOMEN CAN'T DO MEN'S WORK. SO, THEY SHOULDN'T BE PAID THE SAME.
06-11-2007 NOW THE RECENT SUPREME COURT CASE
SUPPPORTIVE OF FURTHER InCOME DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN
MORE LATER...
SOME HISTORY: WOMEN'S WAGES INEXCUSABLE FROM 0.60 CENTS ON THE $1.00 IN THE 60S
TO A MERE INCREASE OF 0.70-0.77 CENTS ON $1.00 IN 2007
06-07-2007 We pray to escape another heated Site debate BETWEEN THE WOMEN'S ECONOMIC RIGHTS ADVOCATES and the more vocal PRO-FEMINIST OPPOSITION. Since the 60s, several Site Participants [ALL MALE] researched this issue horrified to discover the unbelievable FACT: Women se being discriminated against with 0.60 on the $1.00 wages. This is being the real intent of the old "MALE" AND "FEMALE" NEWSPAPER JOB Advertisements. Outaged teh compiles the first paper oft 'FEMALE SEXUAL DISCRIMINATION" in the House commentaries regarding insertion of the word "sex" into that historic legislation. [Meaning: It was inserted as a "joke." Some joke; some reaction. To think 1.00 to 1.00 equality wages for the same or similar employment - is inexcusable. Especially to one Site Participants - a co=spomsor of the "Equal Rights Ammendment." Witnessing it defeat by one vote. Time is pregnant FOR equal wages for equal or similar work for women to be THE LAW OF THE LAND. Not to mention expected immigration avalanches over the next 15 years. Driving wages down further.
Women of the World Unite; you have only the chains of substandard wages to break. And Break NOW!!!
[The Cynic: There's going to be an emotional site war over this. The feminists favored a more "vigorous approach." I'm leaving town for two weeks. Even the Satirist is angry: "You Know, Man, My Mama was a women." ]
I'M AN "ORIGINALIST." I MAKE UP MY OWN LAW!!! IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT, LOOK AT THE PICTURE ABOVE!!!
ANTWON. AFTER THIS VOTE, YOU BETTER NOT COME WITHIN 5 FEET OF ME!
AMERICA'S OLIGARCHY
THE FIVE ARISTOCRATS
WE ARE ALARMED REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT'S 2007 DECISION
WHICH PROBABLY WILL "RE-SEGREGATE" THE US SCHOOL SYSTEM
We are meticulously studying the recent "questionable" decision which, in effect, may overturned BROWN. If this is the case, the Court bears reprehensible moral guilt for relegating African-American youth to substandard education. Why? Most African-Amereicans reside in DE FACTO Segregated IMPOVERISHED AREAS. Meaning: Their local tax base cannot provide a fair and just educational opportunity. Denying them the any fair chance for educational and economic, advancement in our society
First, it was women. Now, it is African-Americans. Let us see? Who is next? Yes! Grandma! Let us - through convoluted tortured legal reasoning, pretense and obfuscation - deny Grandma her Social Security. We will have our beloved Antwon - the Originalist - create some jusrisprudential nonsense. We are such intellectuals! Yes. They will cheer us at the Country Club. For we - The Five Oligarchs - rule America - not the corrupt crazy Congress and the Wacco Executive Branch. And, of course, all for the best interest of "THE GREAT IGNORANT UNWASHED!"
WE ARE ALARMED REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT'S 2007 DECISION
WHICH PROBABLY WILL "RE-SEGREGATE" THE US SCHOOL SYSTEM
We are meticulously studying the recent "questionable" decision which, in effect, may overturned BROWN. If this is the case, the Court bears reprehensible moral guilt for relegating African-American youth to substandard education. Why? Most African-Amereicans reside in DE FACTO Segregated IMPOVERISHED AREAS. Meaning: Their local tax base cannot provide a fair and just educational opportunity. Denying them the any fair chance for educational and economic, advancement in our society
Does The Supreme Court posess no shame.
Does The Supreme Court posess no shame.
Does The Supreme Court posess no shame.
AMERICA'S OLIGARCHY
THE FIVE ARISTOCRATS
WE ARE ALARMED REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT'S 2007 DECISION
WHICH PROBABLY WILL "RE-SEGREGATE" THE US SCHOOL SYSTEM
We are meticulously studying the recent "questionable" decision which, in effect, may overturned BROWN. If this is the case, the Court bears reprehensible moral guilt for relegating African-American youth to substandard education. Why? Most African-Amereicans reside in DE FACTO Segregated IMPOVERISHED AREAS. Meaning: Their local tax base cannot provide a fair and just educational opportunity. Denying them the any fair chance for educational and economic, advancement in our society
First, it was women. Now, it is African-Americans. Let us see? Who is next? Yes! Grandma! Let us - through convoluted tortured legal reasoning, pretense and obfuscation - deny Grandma her Social Security. We will have our beloved Antwon - the Originalist - create some jusrisprudential nonsense. We are such intellectuals! Yes. They will cheer us at the Country Club. For we - The Five Oligarchs - rule America - not the corrupt crazy Congress and the Wacco Executive Branch. And, of course, all for the best interest of "THE GREAT IGNORANT UNWASHED!"
WE ARE ALARMED REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT'S 2007 DECISION
WHICH PROBABLY WILL "RE-SEGREGATE" THE US SCHOOL SYSTEM
We are meticulously studying the recent "questionable" decision which, in effect, may overturned BROWN. If this is the case, the Court bears reprehensible moral guilt for relegating African-American youth to substandard education. Why? Most African-Amereicans reside in DE FACTO Segregated IMPOVERISHED AREAS. Meaning: Their local tax base cannot provide a fair and just educational opportunity. Denying them the any fair chance for educational and economic, advancement in our society
Who are these people comprising THE GANG OF FIVE? Unelected. They need not account to the Governed. The Constitution does not guarantee "A CONSERVATIVE NOR LIBERAL ACTIVIST SUPREME COURT." Five ARISTOCRATS TO RULE - NOT GOVERN - THE NATION. We are researching reforms to check their unfettered political power. More soon...
First, it was women. Now, it is African-Americans. Let us see? Who is next? Yes! Grandma! Let us - through convoluted tortured legal reasoning, pretense and obfuscation - deny Grandma her Social Security. We will have our beloved Antwon - the Originalist - create some jusrisprudential nonsense. We are such intellectuals! Yes. They will cheer us at the Country Club. For we - The Five Oligarchs - rule America - not the corrupt crazy Congress and the Wacco Executive Branch. And, of course, all for the best interest of "THE GREAT IGNORANT UNWASHED!"
WE ARE ALARMED REGARDING THE SUPREME COURT'S 2007 DECISION
WHICH PROBABLY WILL "RE-SEGREGATE" THE US SCHOOL SYSTEM
We are meticulously studying the recent "questionable" decision which, in effect, may overturned BROWN. If this is the case, the Court bears reprehensible moral guilt for relegating African-American youth to substandard education. Why? Most African-Amereicans reside in DE FACTO Segregated IMPOVERISHED AREAS. Meaning: Their local tax base cannot provide a fair and just educational opportunity. Denying them the any fair chance for educational and economic, advancement in our society.
Some jurisprudence scholars consider this decision a BLATANT JUDICIAL AND PERSONAL PREJUDICE. Thereby, INFLICTING DE JURE - SEGREGATION AS A MATTER OF LAW upon African-Americans. Extant prior to BROWN = EQUATING TO PLESSEY VS FERGUSON [SP].
If this prove to be the result, then all US Citizens must respond to "kill" this abhorrent decision. Which is NOT A CONSERVATIVE RULING, but rather A RADICAL POLITICAL ONE - without the substantiation of THE RULE OF JURISPRUDENCE [LAW], [founded upon the RULE OF REASON].
Much More To Come...
The Cynic: "How can Clarence Thomas live with himself?"
